a)God the Creator
Introduction: The doctrine of creation is not set forth
in Scripture as a philosophical solution of the problem of the world, but in
its ethical and religious significance, as a revelation of the relation of man
to his God. The doctrine of creation
stresses the fact that God is the origin of all things, and that all things
belong to him and are subject to him.
The knowledge of it is derived from Scripture only and is accepted by
faith (Heb.11:3). We will study that
creation is an act of the triune God and creation is a free act of God in
brief.
1 God
the creator: Creation is an act
of the triune God. Scripture teaches us
that the triune God is the author of creation (Gen.1:1; Isa.40:12; 44:24;
45:12) and this distinguishes him from idols (Ps.96:5; Isa.37:16;
Jer.10:11-12). Though the Father is in
the foreground in the work of creation, it is also clearly recognized as a work
of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor.8:6).
The Son’s participation in it is indicated in Jn.1:3; 1 Cor.8:6;
Col.1:15-17, and the activity of the Spirit in it finds expression in Gen.1:2;
Job 26:13; 33:4; Ps.104:30; Isa.40:12-13.
The second and the third persons are not dependent powers or mere
intermediaries, but independent authors together with the Father. The work was not divided among the three
persons, but the whole work, though from different aspects, is ascribed to each
one of the persons. All things are at
once out of the Father, through the Son, and in the Holy Spirit. In general it may be said that being is out
of the Father, thought or the idea out of the Son, and life out of the Holy
Spirit. Since the Father takes the
initiative in the work of creation, it is often ascribed to him economically.
2 Creation
a free act of God: Creation is
sometimes represented as a necessary act of God than as a free act determined
by his sovereign will. However, this is
not a Scriptural position. The Christian
church from the very beginning taught the doctrine of creation as a free act
God and ex nihilo ‘creation out of nothing.’
The Bible teaches us that God created all things, according to the
counsel of his will (Eph.1:11; Rev.4:11), and that he is self-sufficient and is
not dependent on his creatures in any way (Job 22:2-3; Acts 17:25).
Conclusion: The faith of the church in the creation
of the world is expressed in the very first article of the Apostolic Confession
of Faith, “I believe in God the Father, Almighty, Maker of heaven and
earth.” This is an expression of the
faith of the early church, that God by his almighty power brought forth the
universe out of nothing. The expression
‘Maker of heaven and earth’ was not contained in the original form of the creed,
but represent a later addition. It ascribes
to the Father, that is, to the first person in the Trinity, the origination of
all things. This is in harmony with the
representation of the New Testament that all things are of the Father, through
the Son, and in the Holy Spirit. The
word ‘Maker’ is a rendering of the word poieten, found in the Greek form of the
Apostolic Confession, while the Latin form has creatorem. Evidently, it is to be understood as a
synonymous term for ‘Creator.’ ‘To
create’ was understood in the early church in the strict sense of ‘to bring
forth something out of nothing.’
b).Creation out of nothing
(Creatio ex nihilo)
Introduction: The doctrine of creation is that the
universe of space, time, energy, matter, life, and humanity is absolutely and
solely dependent upon the free and sovereign will of God. Creation is an act of the divine
freedom. It is not necessary for God to
create in the sense of something external to God determining the divine
action. God wills or chooses to
create. The freedom of the divine creativity
has traditionally been expressed in the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo, creation
out of nothing.
1 Meaning
of the term ‘creation out of nothing’: The
expression ‘to create or bring forth out of nothing’ is not found in the
Scripture. Although the freedom of the
divine activity, which has been expressed in the doctrine of creation out of
nothing, is the implication of the sovereign lordship in the developed doctrine
of creation in the OT (Isa.45:7), it is stated explicitly only in the
inter-testamental period (2 Macc.7:28) and in the NT (rom.4:17; Heb.11:3). This doctrine of ‘creation out of nothing’
was formulated by the church to distinguish the Christian view of creation from
other interpretations which endangered the fundamental meaning of the Christian
view of creation.
2 Scriptural
basis for the doctrine of ‘creation out of nothing’: Gen.1:1 records the beginning of the work of creation, and it
certainly does not represent God as bringing the world forth out of
pre-existent material. It was creation
out of nothing, creation in the strict sense of the word, and therefore the
only part of the work recorded in Gen.1 to which Calvin would apply the
term. But even in the remaining part of
the chapter God is represented as calling forth all things by the word of his
power, by a divine fiat. The same truth
is taught in such passages as Ps.33:6, 9; 148:5). The strongest passage is Heb.11:3, “By faith
we understand that the worlds have been framed by the word of God, so that what
is seen hath not been made out of things which appear.” Creation is here represented as a fact which
we apprehend only by faith. According to
this passage, the world certainly was not made out of anything that is palpable
to the senses. The doctrine of creation
out of nothing is liable to misunderstanding, and has often been misunderstood
and misinterpreted as we shall see below.
3 Other
interpretations of creation: There have
been other views of creation which endangered the fundamental meaning of the
Christian view. It was against such
wrong views of creation that the church formulated the doctrine of ‘creation
out of nothing.’ We will see some of
them and the Church’s reaction to those wrong interpretations.
(a) Dualist view: Dualism, which was very common in the Hellenistic world, asserts
that there are primary two primary,
equal, and eternal principles or realities, namely, (i) the principle of
structure or meaning usually called the forms or ideas, and (ii) the passive
material principle which receives its form from the other principle. Here creation is understood on the analogy of
human creation or fashioning out of some given material. This dualist view contradicted two of the
Christian basic beliefs about the relation of God to the world, such as:
(i) First, the dualist view contradicted
the biblical testimony to God as sovereign lord of all reality by asserting
that God is only one of two primary and fundamental principles of reality, both
of which are self-sufficient and eternal.
Thus, in a dualistic view God is always finite and limited by the other
principle and therefore not sovereign lord.
(ii) Second, a dualism in which one principle is ‘divine’ and
‘the other is not’ always tends to become a moral dualism in which all good
comes from the divine principle and all evil from the other principle. Thus in later Hellenistic thought the
material principle came to be understood as the source of evil.
The
church’s assertions of ‘creation out of nothing’: So, for the above two reasons the early Christians formulated
the doctrine of creation in distinction primarily from dualism by asserting
creation out of nothing. By this they
denied that there was any primary, eternal principle beside God out of which
God created the world. In denying dualism the church also asserted something
positive, such as:
(i) First, God is the sole source of all
existence or reality; every aspect of reality is dependent upon God.
(ii) Second, nothing is essentially or
intrinsically evil. Nothing in the
material, dynamic, or structural, aspects of reality is evil. Therefore,, everything is essentially good
although it may be existentially disrupted and evil. Thus everything which is evil is redeemable.
(iii) Thirdly, creation is not like human
creation but is a completely unique act of absolute origination, in which there
is no presupposed material, in which finite reality comes into being ‘out of
nothing.’
It
was primarily against this dualistic view of creation that the church
formulated the doctrine of ‘creation out of nothing.’ But there was also another view of creation
which prompted the church to formulate this doctrine of creation out of
nothing. It was the monist or pantheist view of creation. We will see the monist or pantheist view of
creation below:
(b) Monist or Pantheist view of creation: Monism asserts that the creation is made
neither out of pre-existent matter nor out of nothing but out of God. Here creation is understood as generation on
the analogy of reproduction in animals, or as water from fountain or the emission
of light from a candle. Again this view
of creation contradicted certain basic Christian convictions about God and the
world. We will see such contradictions:
(i) First, it implied that
humanity is essentially divine or contained a divine principle. Thus a person cannot really be a sinner but
only perhaps ignorant of the good and the true because of involvement in lower
levels of being.
(ii) Secondly, this view tends toward the
idea that all finite existence is illusory and evil. This tendency follows from the idea in monism
that the reality and value of individual finite things consists in the degree to
which they are united with or identical with God. What is not God is neither good nor
real. But the more things are considered
in their finitude and individuality, the more they are distinct from God who is
one and infinite. Thus finite things tend to be considered to be essentially
fallen from perfection into evil and unreality, and salvation comes to be
understood in terms of the loss of individuality and finitude.
Because
of the above tendencies the church asserted against monism the doctrine of
creation out of nothing and not out of God.
We will see what steps the church has taken against these tendencies:
The
church’s action against monism: The
church asserted against monism the doctrine of creation not ‘out of God,‘ but
‘out of nothing.’ This involved certain
positive affirmations, such as:
(i) First, creatures are not essentially
evil or illusory in their finite individuality.
Rather they are solidly real and essentially good as creatures to whom
God has freely given a limited independence of existence. In humanity this relative independence
includes freedom over against God, which however is ultimately dependent upon
God for its reality.
(ii) Second, finite individuality is not
essentially evil and therefore can be redeemed from sin, and its salvation does
not involve the loss of its individuality.
Conclusion: In view of the fact that the expression
‘creation out of nothing’ is liable to misunderstanding, and has often been
misunderstood, will it be preferable to speak of creation without the use of
pre-existing material? God is able to
call into being what does not exist, and does so call it into being.
No comments:
Post a Comment